<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fuel and Energy Alternatives &#187; Nuclear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com/category/nuclear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com</link>
	<description>Alternative Energy and Fuel Information as well as Tips on Conserving Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:28:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Your friendly Neighborhood Nuclear Reactor</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com/2008/11/08/your-friendly-neighborhood-nuclear-reactor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com/2008/11/08/your-friendly-neighborhood-nuclear-reactor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 03:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow! I just read this article over at the Guardian about miniature nuclear reactors that could power 20,000 homes, cost $25 million US dollars and essentially be buried underground, refueled every seven to ten years. No moving parts, not weapons grade fuel, according to the article a Chernobyl style leakage is &#8220;impossible&#8221;. This is apparently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  I just read <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/09/miniature-nuclear-reactors-los-alamos">this article over at the Guardian</a> about miniature nuclear reactors that could power 20,000 homes, cost $25 million US dollars and essentially be buried underground, refueled every seven to ten years.</p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span></p>
<p>No moving parts, not weapons grade fuel, according to the article a Chernobyl style leakage is &#8220;impossible&#8221;.  This is apparently technology from Los Alamos laboratories and the United States government has licensed the technology to a New Mexico based company called Hyperion.  They say they currently have more than 100 orders and have plans to up their production potential.  They&#8217;ve got a six year backlog.</p>
<p>This box could be delivered on a truck, &#8220;smaller than a garden shed&#8221; is how the Guardian has billed it.  Mass production is expected within about 5 years.  The units would be encased in concrete.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Other companies are known to be designing micro-reactors. Toshiba has been testing 200KW reactors measuring roughly six metres by two metres. Designed to fuel smaller numbers of homes for longer, they could power a single building for up to 40 years.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com/2008/11/08/your-friendly-neighborhood-nuclear-reactor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.fuelandenergyalternatives.com @ 2012-02-08 23:49:37 -->
